Current:Home > MarketsDuke Energy Takes Aim at the Solar Panels Atop N.C. Church -Clarity Finance Guides
Duke Energy Takes Aim at the Solar Panels Atop N.C. Church
View
Date:2025-04-14 08:31:33
When environmental advocates started selling cheap solar power to a church in Greensboro, N.C., five months ago, they did it to test the state’s ban on non-utility providers of renewable energy. But now the state’s largest utility, Duke Energy, is fighting back.
As state regulators review the controversial case, the battle lines are clearly drawn. Advocates at North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network (NC WARN) and members of Faith Community Church support policy change. Duke Energy has responded by asking regulators to impose a stiff financial penalty against NC WARN that could threaten to shut down the organization.
“The stakes are high,” said Jim Warren, executive director of NC WARN, a small nonprofit dedicated to tackling climate change by promoting renewable energy. Referring to Duke Energy, Warren said, “they certainly don’t want competition.”
When NC WARN submitted the case for regulatory review by the North Carolina Utilities Commission back in June, it argued that it should be exempted from the third-party sales restriction because it was providing funding and a service to the church beyond selling electricity.
If the commission lets the partnership stand—a decision not expected for several months—it would open the door to similar projects. And the interest is already there: dozens of churches looking to following in Faith Community Church’s footsteps have reached out to NC WARN in recent months, said Warren.
North Carolina is one of four states with limitations on third-party sales. Earlier this year legislators proposed a bill allowing third-party solar providers in the state, but it failed to get out of committee. Seeing this case as an opportunity, SolarCity and other solar proponents including North Carolina Interfaith Power & Light have filed in support of NC WARN’s position.
But Duke Energy argues there is no wiggle room in the existing law, a position shared by the public staff of the Utilities commission, which makes policy recommendations to the commission but is not the same as the seven commissioners who will ultimately vote on this case.
“The law is clear in North Carolina,” said company spokesman Randy Wheeless. If you want to sell power in the state, that makes you a utility and subject to all the regulations that come with that role. That’s why Duke has proposed regulators impose a $1,000 fine on NC WARN for every day its solar panels are connected to the grid. That would amount to more than $120,000.
Regulators have charged power providers similar daily fines for violations in the past, Wheeless explained.
Sam Watson, general counsel for the Utilities Commission, told InsideClimate News that similar penalties have been imposed, but their circumstances are not similar to this case.
According to NC WARN’s Warren, the group’s budget in 2015 was less than $1 million and a large fine would be debilitating.
“It’s a strong attack and … we have never heard of them doing anything like this in any other state,” Warren said. He added that he believed Duke Energy was targeting the group because of its criticism of North Carolina’s largest utility in recent years.
Duke did not respond directly to this charge. But Wheeless did say that NC WARN’s efforts, beyond the church solar project, amounted to “tossing fireballs against the fence” and were a “waste of time and money” for the utility company.
Both sides have until Nov. 20 to respond to one another’s comments. After that, the commission may either decide to hold an evidentiary hearing—which would lead to more hearings and extend the case—or make a decision.
If NC WARN loses the case, it has already agreed to donate the 20-panel solar array to Faith Community so the non-denomenational, largely African-American church would continue to benefit from solar power.
veryGood! (123)
Related
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Advocates scramble to aid homeless migrant families after Massachusetts caps emergency shelter slots
- Russian convicted over journalist Anna Politkovskaya's murder pardoned after serving in Ukraine
- With a boost from John Oliver, pūteketeke soars to first in New Zealand bird contest
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Emboldened by success in other red states, effort launched to protect abortion rights in Nebraska
- Potential kingmaker in Dutch coalition talks comes out against anti-Islam firebrand Wilders
- One year on from World Cup, Qatar and FIFA urged by rights group to do more for migrant workers
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Plant-based meat is a simple solution to climate woes - if more people would eat it
Ranking
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- UAW labor deal with Detroit's Big 3 automakers sees pushback from some workers
- Mississippi governor rejects revenue estimate, fearing it would erode support for income tax cut
- Father of July 4th parade shooting suspect turns himself in to begin jail sentence
- Small twin
- U.N. Security Council schedules a vote on a resolution urging humanitarian pauses, corridors in Gaza
- Lisa Kudrow thanks 'Friends' co-star Matthew Perry 'for the best 10 years': See tribute
- Minnesota Rep. Angie Craig seeks accountability for attacker ahead of his sentencing
Recommendation
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
New York sues PepsiCo Inc. for plastic pollution, alleging the company contaminated drinking water
China's real estate crisis, explained
China's real estate crisis, explained
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Justin Torres and Ned Blackhawk are among the winners of National Book Awards
Michigan has no records of Connor Stalions filing any expense reports, FOIA request shows
Texas Violated the Law with Lax Emissions Limits, Federal Court Rules